In recent days, Richard Nii Armah Quaye has dominated online conversations following reports and discussions surrounding his divorce from Joana Quaye. The situation gained significant public attention after an interview granted on The Delay Show, hosted by Deloris Frimpong Manso.
In response to the growing public discourse, legal representatives of Joana Quaye, Dame & Partners, have issued an official press statement addressing what they describe as “false and prejudicial allegations” made during the interview.
Legal Response to Allegations
According to the statement, the interview granted by Richard Nii Armah Quaye occurred while an appeal is actively pending before the Court of Appeal. The legal team emphasizes that several claims made during the interview are “substantially untrue” and relate to matters currently under judicial consideration.
They argue that these public comments risk undermining due process and could unfairly influence public perception regarding ongoing legal proceedings.
Clarification on Marriage and Wealth Claims
A key issue addressed in the statement is the timeline of the couple’s marriage and financial standing. The legal team asserts that:
- The marriage between the parties took place in 2010, shortly after Mr. Quaye’s return from the United Kingdom.
- At the time, he allegedly had no significant properties, contrary to claims suggesting pre-marital wealth.
These details, the statement notes, are part of official court records and cannot be altered by public commentary or media narratives.
Dispute Over Business Interests
The statement also references the joint establishment of Quick Credit & Investment Micro-Credit Company Limited in 2011 by both parties as original shareholders.
It further alleges that:
- There were unauthorized transfers of shares belonging to Joana Quaye.
- Company resources were used to acquire properties and establish other businesses without her knowledge.
These matters, according to the legal team, are documented in court proceedings and remain subject to judicial determination.
Concerns Over Media Influence
Joana Quaye’s lawyers have raised concerns about the timing of the interview, stating that granting such media exposure during active appellate proceedings could:
- Prejudice public opinion
- Undermine the integrity of the judicial process
- Obstruct the fair administration of justice
They characterize the interview as an attempt to sway public sentiment rather than present verified facts.
Call for Public Restraint
The statement concludes with a call for the public to disregard what it describes as “wild and unfounded claims,” including assertions of wealth before marriage, highlighted by references to alleged ownership of assets such as a VW Passat.
Joana Quaye, through her legal team, maintains her confidence in Ghana’s justice system and expresses hope for:
- Accountability for alleged wrongdoing
- A fair and equitable distribution of marital assets
Ongoing Public Interest
As the case continues to unfold, public interest remains high, fueled by social media discussions and the prominence of the individuals involved. However, legal experts caution against drawing conclusions until the courts deliver a final ruling.
For now, the matter remains firmly within the judicial system, with both legal and public narratives continuing to evolve.