Counsellor George Lutterodt has defended media personality Deloris Frimpong Manso, popularly known as Delay, following criticism after her recent interview with Richard Nii-Armah Quaye.
Speaking on Angel FM, the marriage counsellor rejected assertions that Delay is ineffective as an interviewer, arguing that her long-standing presence in the media tells a different story.
Lutterodt believes her career span alone reflects endurance and professional weight, pointing to nearly two decades in the industry as evidence of her credibility and influence.
“Some people were saying Delay doesn’t know how to ask questions, but that’s okay. She’s always delayed and in her delay, people get orgasm,” he said.
He went on to describe her media journey as one marked by consistent battles and survival, insisting she has managed to stay relevant despite industry pressures and setbacks.
“In her 18 years of doing her show, what has she not fought? She’s fought TV stations, radio stations and she’s done a lot in life. She has credible sponsors on her show, a solid team, and she’s able to attract people for interviews,” he stated.
Shifting to the controversy around her interview with RNAQ, Lutterodt argued that the nature of questioning falls squarely within Delay’s discretion as an experienced host, suggesting critics are missing the point of her approach.
“Even if RNAQ went to beg Delay to interview him by payment, Delay is wise. If Delay interviewed RNAQ without taking money, she’s a fool, with no apologies. Because in the heat of the moment, everybody wishes to interview RNAQ,” he shared.
He further defended her journalistic choices, insisting that interviewers are not obligated to follow public expectation when framing their questions.
“If Delay was able to get RNAQ and interview him, there are questions she wants to ask, not necessarily what the public expects. Why is she being trolled? Things that are known already, you don’t ask.” he said.
According to him, RNAQ also had agency in the exchange and was not restricted in how he responded during the conversation.
“If the man you’re asking the questions decides to answer, he should do that. Delay didn’t provide answers to him. All the questions Delay asked were answered,” he noted.
Concluding his remarks, Lutterodt described the interview as fair and effective, insisting Delay executed her role properly and should be supported rather than criticised.
“It was a perfect interview and I’m in support of it. If every man would come out of their way to clarify issues when they believe something is untrue, we would have sanity in our judgment in the public court of opinion,” Lutterodt further stated.
Watch his statement below.